» GC Stats |
Members: 329,704
Threads: 115,665
Posts: 2,204,908
|
Welcome to our newest member, davidwalker5 |
|
 |
|

10-28-2006, 08:17 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,819
|
|
Michigan's Prop 2 to ban affirmative action
It's the hottest issue going on in Michigan and is apparently being watched carefully in other parts of the country. Apparently the same group who got this passed in California is trying to get it passed here. There were legal controversies over how they got it on the ballot. It's titled The Civil Rights Initiative, but bans affirmative action.
Opponents say it is a step backward for Civil Rights, will hurt programs like free mammograms and ovarian cancer screenings because they are for women only and for free prostate cancer screenings because they are only for men.
Proponents say it is a step forward because it will eliminate reverse discrimination and focus only on race, not women.
The proponents are very misleading in their ads, in my opinion, but I think they are getting the support of people who don't realize the full impact.
While I think it would be great if we were at a point where affirmative action was no longer necessary, I don't think we're there.. in fact, I think we're far from it.
Some links (pro and con) for reference:
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...8/1068/OPINION
http://www.grandhaventribune.com/pai...1600508865.bsp
http://www.cew.umich.edu/PDFs/MCRIecon6-25.pdf
http://www.wzzm13.com/news/news_arti...?storyid=63805
http://thesouthend.typepad.com/tsene...rallies_a.html
Discuss.. please keep it civil.
|

10-28-2006, 03:33 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,584
|
|
Amazing how our duly elected morons seem to legislate our morality.
It usually comes with a price doesn't!
It just doesn't seem to matter to us as citizens anymore.
Now trial segregated class rooms by gender in Missouri.
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|

10-29-2006, 02:11 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 94
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee
While I think it would be great if we were at a point where affirmative action was no longer necessary, I don't think we're there.. in fact, I think we're far from it.
|
Can you cite a few instances where affirmative action has had a positive effect?
In the areas I'm familiar with, affirmative action in the schools, busing for integration, etc. has been abandoned as a failure.
Do you favor affirmative action in the NBA, requiring each team to take a token number of white guys who can't jump and a number of short guys of any race?
Or requiring each NHL team to take a few southern boys who can't skate?
|

10-29-2006, 04:11 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
Were any of you who say that Affirmative Action has had NO positive effect alive prior to the sixties or seventies?
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|

10-29-2006, 01:42 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Back home in FLA
Posts: 782
|
|
Affirmative Action sure had it's place in history.
Anyone who forgets the way this country was before the civil rights initiatives of the 60's couldn't have been alive. I WAS and I remember. I believe PBS is re-airing Eyes on the Prize. It's one of the most worthy programs ever shown on television, and I hope millions of new viewers see it each time it airs.
But to say that mammograms and prostate screenings would be eliminated is a use of ridiculous scare tactics. It might make some feel that you shouldn't have to tell lies to prevent the passage/rollback of a worthy law.
In 40 years we've come too far, and changed too much, to think that we still need the full blown mechanisms of Affirmative Action, though. Those are my feelings.
|

10-29-2006, 03:19 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Regardless of people's feelings on this, I get a bit bothered with the "if you weren't here, you don't understand" argument. Just because people lived through a certain time period doesn't mean they have a greater understanding of a topic than someone born more recently. It sounds more like a cop-out to limit debate. Just a pet peeve of mine.
I hadn't heard anything about this, although I haven't had as much time to check the news lately. Is it definite that it will be on the ballot, even with the legal challenges? It will certainly be something to watch for on election day.
|

10-29-2006, 11:42 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,807
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnchorAlum
Affirmative Action sure had it's place in history.
Anyone who forgets the way this country was before the civil rights initiatives of the 60's couldn't have been alive. I WAS and I remember. I believe PBS is re-airing Eyes on the Prize. It's one of the most worthy programs ever shown on television, and I hope millions of new viewers see it each time it airs.
But to say that mammograms and prostate screenings would be eliminated is a use of ridiculous scare tactics. It might make some feel that you shouldn't have to tell lies to prevent the passage/rollback of a worthy law.
In 40 years we've come too far, and changed too much, to think that we still need the full blown mechanisms of Affirmative Action, though. Those are my feelings.
|
I don't think they are scare tactics. If this proposal is passed, it will pretty much do away with things like Title IX. I'm wondering how this would affect Greek Life.
And Affirmative Action had its place in history. Yes. But I think it's quite ridiculous when a person who is considered just a SMIDGEN of minority gets into a college like Universtiy of Michigan, when a caucasian person who had a better GPA, more activies in high school, and better standardized test scores misses his chance because a certain quota needs to be filled.
__________________
Proud to be a Macon Magnolia!
KLTC
|

10-30-2006, 12:32 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,819
|
|
Some stats to show that we aren't there yet.. from a CNN article in December 2004:
On average, women make 78 percent of men's wages, according to a 2003 study by the U.S. Department of Labor. This is, however, a marked improvement over 25 years ago -- in 1979, women made 62 percent of what men earned
At the current rate of change, working women will not achieve equal pay until after the year 2050. That's almost 100 years after President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act into law, prohibiting discrimination based on sex resulting in unequal pay for equal work.
The pay gap differs by race, with the earnings of white women being just 78 percent of those of white men; black women making 91 percent as much as their male counterparts; and Hispanic women earning 88 percent of what Hispanic men earn. The Rutgers School of Management Relations says this is primarily because white men still earn the most among all groups of workers.
Females doctors only earn 58 percent of their male counterparts' salaries. Even in predominantly female fields like nursing and teaching, women still earn less than men: female nurses earn 91 percent and female teachers earn 87 percent of what their male counterparts do.
The link: http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Careers/1...ref=sitesearch
I believe this article shows that it has had a positive affect. I'm not convinced that without affirmative action in place, more people wouldn't be discriminated against based on race and/or gender. Just as I don't think the citizens of the US would elect a female or minority President, I don't think we're ready to ditch affirmative action.
And yes, the legal challenges are done and it is on the ballot billed as a Civil Rights Initiative, which most people I've talked to agree is a deceiving title for this proposal.
I believe the outcome will be determined by two factors:
1) Who gets out to vote
2) Whether the people who get out to vote actually understand what the proposal means
|

10-30-2006, 10:48 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,006
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee
Some stats to show that we aren't there yet.. from a CNN article in December 2004:
On average, women make 78 percent of men's wages, according to a 2003 study by the U.S. Department of Labor. This is, however, a marked improvement over 25 years ago -- in 1979, women made 62 percent of what men earned
At the current rate of change, working women will not achieve equal pay until after the year 2050. That's almost 100 years after President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act into law, prohibiting discrimination based on sex resulting in unequal pay for equal work.
The pay gap differs by race, with the earnings of white women being just 78 percent of those of white men; black women making 91 percent as much as their male counterparts; and Hispanic women earning 88 percent of what Hispanic men earn. The Rutgers School of Management Relations says this is primarily because white men still earn the most among all groups of workers.
Females doctors only earn 58 percent of their male counterparts' salaries. Even in predominantly female fields like nursing and teaching, women still earn less than men: female nurses earn 91 percent and female teachers earn 87 percent of what their male counterparts do.
The link: http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Careers/1...ref=sitesearch
I believe this article shows that it has had a positive affect. I'm not convinced that without affirmative action in place, more people wouldn't be discriminated against based on race and/or gender. Just as I don't think the citizens of the US would elect a female or minority President, I don't think we're ready to ditch affirmative action.
And yes, the legal challenges are done and it is on the ballot billed as a Civil Rights Initiative, which most people I've talked to agree is a deceiving title for this proposal.
I believe the outcome will be determined by two factors:
1) Who gets out to vote
2) Whether the people who get out to vote actually understand what the proposal means
|
I have also heard that the stats on women's salaries are not 100% accurate because of the number of hours women work, the type of field they go into (e.g. in medicine, women are less likely to go into higher paying specializations)
Here's an article that examines the wage gap:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12760790/
ETA: And we are also less likely to negotiate our salary than our male counterparts.
Last edited by Taualumna; 10-30-2006 at 10:57 AM.
|

10-30-2006, 01:21 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
Regardless of people's feelings on this, I get a bit bothered with the "if you weren't here, you don't understand" argument. Just because people lived through a certain time period doesn't mean they have a greater understanding of a topic than someone born more recently. It sounds more like a cop-out to limit debate. Just a pet peeve of mine.
|
Your opinion is noted, however sometimes experience really is the best teacher. Some things simply don't translate to the printed page.
Not always.
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|

10-30-2006, 02:05 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater New York
Posts: 4,537
|
|
yeah, I kind of feel that way about something that happened in my life toward the end of the cold war...I can't really describe how I felt watching the Berlin wall being torn down, or when Gorbachev was arrested, I mean, I'm not saying that no one in the future could have a valid opinion, or even a more accurate, well-informed opinion than I could...but we watched it everyday in class, on the news, as it happened. I thought that there was going to be a coup here, I didn't feel threatened the same way this last time with Thailand.
__________________
Love Conquers All
|

10-30-2006, 08:00 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 4,288
|
|
The same people got it passed here a few years ago. I think it only affected higher ed admission but I can't really remember. I do know that this fall the news was going on about how minority admission has gone up since it passed.
__________________
GFB
Founded Upon a Rock....
Connect. Impact. Shine
|

10-30-2006, 08:11 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orlando..unfortunately....
Posts: 1,014
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmartBlondeGPhB
The same people got it passed here a few years ago. I think it only affected higher ed admission but I can't really remember. I do know that this fall the news was going on about how minority admission has gone up since it passed.
|
Are you referring to Washington?
I read something a while back about how underrepresented minority enrollment at UC institutions has fallen dramatically.
|

10-31-2006, 05:28 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Beyond
Posts: 5,092
|
|
My take
Minority admissions is horrendous at the University of Washington. Out of ~153 medical student admissions 2 are AfAm., 3 Hispanic and zero Native Americans--which is really piss poor for the state of Washington. I know that for a fact because I work here. More than 47% are of Asian decent with 3% Asian faculty--that is insane given the HUGE Asian population is Seattle alone.
Within 5-10 years without Affirmative Action, California, Texas and Washington have had the largest increases in health disparities in all people of color: increased health deaths usually caused by myocardial infarction, ischemic cerebrovascular disease and type 2 diabetic complications. Asian women are the most at risk for having stage 3 breast cancer compared to other women. African American women die due to stage 3 breast cancer and metastasis. And Native American, as well as Hawaiian Pacific Islander women have be systematically avoided in these stats.
Apparently, people of color who become medical doctors go back to their communities and perform acts of service within their communities.
Most African Americans at University of Washington are there because of atheletic scholarship. Certain Asian Americans, (Pacific Islanders are strongly hurt without support), either pool their money to send their children or have enough money to send. Latinos are coming from other states/countries. And now some Eastern European students are beginning to feel the pinch.
We should have had a weaning period than cold turkey... Folks are literally dying out there...
And you all the think I am full of isht if you want. I really don't care. I know what I do for a living.
__________________
We thank and pledge Alpha Kappa Alpha to remember...
"I'm watching with a new service that translates 'stupid-to-English'" ~ @Shoq of ShoqValue.com 1 of my Tweeple
"Yo soy una mujer negra" ~Zoe Saldana
|

10-31-2006, 06:05 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater New York
Posts: 4,537
|
|
while i'm not sure that massive gov't programs are the answer to everything, i think that once they've been established, to take them away so abruptly is just foolish
__________________
Love Conquers All
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|