» GC Stats |
Members: 325,446
Threads: 115,510
Posts: 2,196,560
|
Welcome to our newest member, ageldarkz5086 |
|
|
|
03-20-2012, 11:18 AM
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,657
|
|
Don't Support Obama's Health Care Reform? You Might be a Racist
Quote:
In an experiment, Tesler presents a health care overhaul policy to whites, telling some that the policy is advocated by Bill Clinton and telling others that it's advocated by Barack Obama; Tesler finds that whites with liberal racial attitudes become more supportive of the policy when they think Obama is its chief advocate, while whites with a conservative attitude become less supportive of the policy when they think of health care as an Obama policy.
|
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012...-care-overhaul
This doesn't really shock me. Folks say that their disdain for the President has nothing to do with race. Anecdotally, at least, coming from the buckle of the Bible Belt, I'd have to say that such claims are utter horseshit.
At least now we're starting to see the emergence of some research which might actually bear that out.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|
03-20-2012, 11:42 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ILL-INI
Posts: 7,208
|
|
|
03-20-2012, 11:42 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,256
|
|
I heard this on the radio this morning and I'm not surprised.
In my personal experience, though, I've seen a lot of people support Barama blindly just because he's Black. Of course, I'm thinking of a demographic (middle-aged Black women) who are pretty solidly Democratic so they'd be supportive of Bill Clinton as well.
|
03-20-2012, 12:48 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someplace fabulous!
Posts: 2,789
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
I heard this on the radio this morning and I'm not surprised.
In my personal experience, though, I've seen a lot of people support Barama blindly just because he's Black. Of course, I'm thinking of a demographic (middle-aged Black women) who are pretty solidly Democratic so they'd be supportive of Bill Clinton as well.
|
Can't be bothered to spell the president's name?
__________________
Kappa Delta
|
03-20-2012, 02:28 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,256
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie Anne
Can't be bothered to spell the president's name?
|
Ech, sometimes I'll say Barama. My nephew invented it when he couldn't quite say Barack Obama.
|
03-20-2012, 06:51 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Munchkin03, with all due respect, my nephews used to say "gotta go poop-poop...stink-stink..." but that doesn't mean a healthy-minded adult should say that when the adult needs to use the restroom. Adults who can type and say the President's name should type and say the President's name--there is no "(President) Barama."
Moreover, depending on who used "Barama," I would feel as though the President was being mocked in addition to mocking names of certain ethnic and cultural origins.
|
03-21-2012, 04:29 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012...-care-overhaul
This doesn't really shock me. Folks say that their disdain for the President has nothing to do with race. Anecdotally, at least, coming from the buckle of the Bible Belt, I'd have to say that such claims are utter horseshit.
At least now we're starting to see the emergence of some research which might actually bear that out.
|
I.ve heard that a lot of "studies" are funded by political groups or special interest groups that demand a set outcome before appoving funding. You can skewer data anyway you see fit but liberals favoring liberal lawmakers and conservatives disliking liberal lawmakers is nothing new to me (other than the racial spin).
And Dr. Phil, there's nothing wrong with a grown adult going poop poop..stink stink....
|
03-21-2012, 08:44 AM
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,657
|
|
I've read the study. It seems fair.
Anecdotally, as I said, there are a lot of angry racist white folks right now. It's hard to coexist with them and not be constantly picking fights. It's even worse when you get to rural Oklahoma. I can't imagine Texas is any better.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|
03-21-2012, 09:03 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back in the Heartland
Posts: 5,424
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001
I.ve heard that a lot of "studies" are funded by political groups or special interest groups that demand a set outcome before appoving funding. You can skewer data anyway you see fit but liberals favoring liberal lawmakers and conservatives disliking liberal lawmakers is nothing new to me (other than the racial spin).
|
Push polling, as it's called is very easy to detect. You may have gotten survey calls asking you if you prefer killing babies or letting them live. The questions are generally about that subtle, if you listen to the actual question at all.
This one seems to have been very careful about setting flat baselines (making both sponsors strong liberals so conservatives would dislike it equally, for example). And I would be very leery of any question that said "some people..." but that also makes for an interesting alternative.
Changing subject slightly, have you read about No Labels? This seems like a great organization and I love their ideas, and perish the thought, it was started by a couple Republicans. www.nolabels.org/work ...
__________________
"Traveling - It leaves you speechless, then turns you into a storyteller. ~ Ibn Battuta
|
03-21-2012, 09:38 AM
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,657
|
|
The study, IIRC, takes more reputable polls and distills information from them.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|
03-21-2012, 10:14 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
The study, IIRC, takes more reputable polls and distills information from them.
|
I'll try to read the full study if I have the time later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubaiSis
Push polling, as it's called is very easy to detect. You may have gotten survey calls asking you if you prefer killing babies or letting them live. The questions are generally about that subtle, if you listen to the actual question at all.
This one seems to have been very careful about setting flat baselines (making both sponsors strong liberals so conservatives would dislike it equally, for example). And I would be very leery of any question that said "some people..." but that also makes for an interesting alternative.
Changing subject slightly, have you read about No Labels? This seems like a great organization and I love their ideas, and perish the thought, it was started by a couple Republicans. www.nolabels.org/work ...
|
No Labels is a good idea but I wouldn't hold your breath on it coming to fruition, it's just not in the best interests of either party to work together like that.
I would have liked to see them compare Obama to someone else, someone more current in politics. I've heard that past presidents are typically looked upon more favorably as time passes (barring scandal i.e. Nixon) plus Clinton is better liked than Obama IMHO. I think his time in office is looked at more favorably. Good economy, pre-9/11, no wars...the good ole days. I've even heard people say they wish that Hillary would have won so Bill Clinton could be in the WH again.
|
03-21-2012, 11:23 AM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,493
|
|
With all the crying that happened at Nixon's funeral, I would say he was probably redeemed a GREAT deal. You have to admit that he did things no one else was brave enough to do (i.e. reaching out to China) and let's face it...even if he would have done everything right the press would have hated him anyway.
American Experience just did a show on Clinton, and it really hits home what a perfect storm he got dropped into (i.e. with Newt G being Speaker) and what a polarizing figure he was...he just made it worse by not being able to keep his dick in his pants.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|
03-21-2012, 12:42 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
With all the crying that happened at Nixon's funeral, I would say he was probably redeemed a GREAT deal. You have to admit that he did things no one else was brave enough to do (i.e. reaching out to China) and let's face it...even if he would have done everything right the press would have hated him anyway.
American Experience just did a show on Clinton, and it really hits home what a perfect storm he got dropped into (i.e. with Newt G being Speaker) and what a polarizing figure he was...he just made it worse by not being able to keep his dick in his pants.
|
I wasn't born until Reagan's first term so I can't speak on experience but other than Watergate I've never heard anything derogatory about the man, same with Kennedy even though I've heard that Kennedy wasn't exactly the most popular president while he was in office.
And isn't every president doomed to be a polarizing figure? It seems that no matter what you do or say as long as you associate with a political party the other half of the country isn't going to agree with you or your policies.
|
03-22-2012, 11:50 AM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,493
|
|
They were just saying that it went beyond "I don't care for Jimmy Carter" to the point that people PASSIONATELY LOVED or PASSIONATELY HATED Clinton. I'm not sure that was him specifically though, rather the way the media/the country is going. There is no "middle" anymore.
And yes, when Kennedy was alive only something like 30% of people in a poll said they voted for him. After he was assassinated, it went up to 70%.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|
03-22-2012, 05:48 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
They were just saying that it went beyond "I don't care for Jimmy Carter" to the point that people PASSIONATELY LOVED or PASSIONATELY HATED Clinton. I'm not sure that was him specifically though, rather the way the media/the country is going. There is no "middle" anymore.
|
I totally agree and it's not just with Clinton. You can see the same parallels with GWB and Obama.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|