Citibank -- Intimidated by her hotness? - Page 3

DrPhil · #31 06-04-2010, 01:15 PM

Keep in mind that sexy is in the eye of the beholder. There are people who fix themselves up and wear nicely tailored outfits but they never achieve attractive and/or sexy. You have to be fair to everyone.

33girl · #32 06-04-2010, 01:22 PM

True dat. My ex evil bitch boss frequently wore very low cut, very tight, and very high heels. She thought that since she paid out the yinyang for it it made it okay. On the other hand, "sexy" was the last thing she was - she kind of put me in mind of an approaching Viking ship with a very large prow.

christiangirl · #33 06-04-2010, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl

....she kind of put me in mind of an approaching Viking ship with a very large prow.

*snicker*

Todd Bridges · #34 06-05-2010, 01:46 AM

I'd definitely would be distracted by that. Damn, she fine.

agzg · #35 06-08-2010, 08:29 AM

I finally looked at the pictures, some of those outfits were pretty cute and I would totally wear them to work, but I work in an office setting where I don't tend to interact with people outside the company/my department in person unless it's a special occasion. That white suit was fug though.

DrPhil · #36 06-08-2010, 10:16 AM

She was on some show (Inside Edition?) last night. She's attractive and wore some nice outfits. She claims she was told not only that the outfits were "too sexy" but that men were coming to that branch only to see her and that was distracting.

I can see that and I can also see how consciously being "sexy" at the workplace (stilettos and pencil skirts are not a leisurely and relaxed type of hotness) can be distracting in terms of HER productivity and the productivity of others.

Ch2tf · #37 06-08-2010, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil

She was on some show (Inside Edition?) last night. She's attractive and wore some nice outfits. She claims she was told not only that the outfits were "too sexy" but that men were coming to that branch only to see her and that was distracting.

I can see that and I can also see how consciously being "sexy" at the workplace (stilettos and pencil skirts are not a leisurely and relaxed type of hotness) can be distracting in terms of HER productivity and the productivity of others.

Yeah, she was on The Early Show with her story the other day. I guess it is becoming even bigger news now because she now works at Chase and they are supposedly "threatening" to fire her since she went public with her claims against Citibank. I was getting dressed while it was on so I didn't really get to hear all of the story and details.

preciousjeni · #38 06-08-2010, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ch2tf

I guess it is becoming even bigger news now because she now works at Chase and they are supposedly "threatening" to fire her since she went public with her claims against Citibank.

That would be exceptionally foolish right now.

BluPhire · #39 06-08-2010, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by preciousjeni

That would be exceptionally foolish right now.

Yep her lawyer said if Chase fires her they will pursue with a lawsuit.

She will never have to work again.

But isn't that the goal of most armtrophies?

preciousjeni · #40 06-08-2010, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BluPhire

She will never have to work again.

You've got that right. Damn, I wasted so much time in school when I should have been getting hot...on second thought, that sounds sexual. Enhancing my hotness? Hell, either way it works.

carynie13 · #41 06-08-2010, 06:11 PM

I don't see anything wrong with many of those outfits. I know other young women who work at banks and wear trendy outfits similar to this with no problems. However, they are not quite the total package like she is. It really is unfair for the bank to, in essence, tell her too dress more frumpy or be fired otherwise. But like BluPhire said, she'll probably never have to work again if she wins the case.

dreamseeker · #42 06-10-2010, 08:22 PM

the title of this thread is missing a word....it should be intimidated by her plastic hotness.

lol @ wanting to be a cross between pamela anderson and carmen electra.

(Carmela

)

libelle · #43 06-10-2010, 08:47 PM

In case you missed HLN last night this clip might shed some more light into the issue:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bes...iref=allsearch

DrPhil · #44 07-06-2010, 11:11 AM

Has it already been stated that this 33 year old woman (who was fired by Citibank) has repeatedly gone under the knife and was featured on a Discovery Channel reality show that chronicled her quest to look like a Playboy Playmate?

If not, that's worth mentioning and highlights two things: 1) She's not really hot if she had to go under the knife for it and 2) She's an attention whore who is using Citibank to further her cause.

Drolefille · #45 07-06-2010, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Has it already been stated that this 33 year old woman (who was fired by Citibank) has repeatedly gone under the knife and was featured on a Discovery Channel reality show that chronicled her quest to look like a Playboy Playmate?

If not, that's worth mentioning and highlights two things: 1) She's not really hot if she had to go under the knife for it and 2) She's an attention whore who is using Citibank to further her cause.

I think Citi called her a publicity hound which is a slightly better term for it, I suppose.

Even then though, it doesn't mean she wasn't fired inappropriately (nor that she was, court cases move too slowly). And she's back working at Chase so I suspect that's why we haven't heard from her so much or so loudly.