Socials vs non-socials.
In *general*, I believe that the groups which would be called social including those described as ethnically social care, but *most* others don't (not sure about the music fraternity groupings).
My rule of thumb among non-locals is that if group A would accept someone who was an active member of group B, then it would accept someone who had resigned from group B *and* vice versa.
__________________
Because "undergrads, please abandon your national policies and make something up" will end well --KnightShadow
|