Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby
In any case, unless F1 has your signature, you are probably in the clear per the rule of the law. A verbal acceptance while drunk is hardly binding.
|
Not necessarily. First, I don't think you're really looking at contract law and defenses to contract formation in the bidding process. No one is going to Court here.
And if they did, he said he was drunk, but drunk doesn't always cut it. It's more druuuuuuunnnnnnnnnkkkk that'll give rise to an intoxication defense (the promisor has to truly be impaired).
What matters here are the rules between the houses. Maybe a signature isn't even necessary? Or maybe F2 would think that anything F1 says is too suspect to be believable? This merits further investigation on OP's part and GreekChat isn't going to cut it.
And with the Waffle House comment, he's at any SEC school not in Missouri or Florida. For whatever reason, there is a Waffle House damn near everywhere in the other SEC states.
