GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Entertainment (http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=205)
-   -   GreekChat.com "Current" Movie Reviews (http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=116990)

Cen1aur 1963 09-20-2011 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 2092955)
I don't think Contagion was meant to be intense like Outbreak. Outbreak is a disaster film whereas Contagion is classified a thriller. I think Contagion was more of a mystery in which we were expected to observe and ponder.

The bolded happened in our theater, as well. People were really quiet and just looking around. LOL. I think that is what Contagion will do that Outbreak will not.

LOL so I guess it wasn't just me. I looked around the theater after Outbreak was over too. Folks were quiet as hell. I think in any given situation with some kind of disease breaking out, I'd be just as concerned about people going crazy and doing more harm to each other than just what the virus was doing to people.

KillarneyRose 09-20-2011 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 2082872)
"Fright Night" better be good. They are taking movies from my childhood. The opening "fright night" theme always scared me.

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...tzIZrX-MbDVHU3

On that Fright Night poster, is the name in the upper right corner Amanda Bearse? Wasn't she on Married with Children? Was she the girlfriend in the movie?

KillarneyRose 09-20-2011 11:48 AM

Has anyone seen Straw Dogs? I want to see it because Alexander Skarsgard + James Marsden = One Yummy Film but I've heard it's extremely violent so I'm torn.

cheerfulgreek 09-20-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cen1aur 1963 (Post 2092950)
There's all kinds of bacteria in the air, so I find it interesting how we haven't been exposed to anything like that yet. If something like this does happen, I hope I'm one of the folks who's immune to it.

What you saw in Outbreak and Contagion are viruses, not bacteria.:) I know what you meant, it's just that they are not the same thing like a lot of people think they are. They are both bad and can be dangerous, it's just that viruses are a lot more dangerous than bacteria, because of the fewer amount of genes which affects the way they're able to adapt.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillarneyRose (Post 2092970)
Has anyone seen Straw Dogs? I want to see it because Alexander Skarsgard + James Marsden = One Yummy Film but I've heard it's extremely violent so I'm torn.

I saw it. I liked it a lot. I gave it 5 stars out of 5. But yes, it is extremely violent. Some of the things I saw in that movie made me really angry. I think you'd like it though.

Cen1aur 1963 09-20-2011 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek (Post 2092976)
What you saw in Outbreak and Contagion are viruses, not bacteria.:) I know what you meant, it's just that they are not the same thing like a lot of people think they are. They are both bad and can be dangerous, it's just that viruses are a lot more dangerous than bacteria, because of the fewer amount of genes which affects the way they're able to adapt.

People get sick from bacteria all the time, so I always thought they were the same. With the exception of cancer, I guess. I remember when I was in high school one of the things we talked about in my history class was the black plague. I thought it was interesting. Eventually these diseases disappear over time, though.

cheerfulgreek 09-20-2011 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cen1aur 1963 (Post 2093086)
People get sick from bacteria all the time, so I always thought they were the same. With the exception of cancer, I guess. I remember when I was in high school one of the things we talked about in my history class was the black plague. I thought it was interesting. Eventually these diseases disappear over time, though.

Nope, they're not the same. Viruses mutate much faster than bacteria. Higher organisms, including protozoa such as malaria, change slowest of all. It's just that it all depends on the relative genetic complexity. Random mutations are less likely to totally cripple a simpler organism, so the fewer the number of genes, the more rapidly an organism can change, yet remain functional. Higher organisms have about 10,000-50,000 genes, bacteria have about 500-5000 genes, and viruses have 3-1000 genes. To make it easier for you to understand how they work, consider two machines, one with just a few components and the other with a lot. The more parts that interact with each other, the less flexibility we have to alter any individual component. If we randomly change one part of a simpler machine, it's less likely to cause problems. It's just that the fewer genes, the more likely mutations will be tolerated and the faster evolution may occur.

Cancer is also different. Cancers happen because of a build-up of genetic damage over the years in non reproductive cells. It's just that cancer cells grow out of control and destroy the body to which they belong. Toxic chemicals, both natural and artificial, and ultraviolet radiation from the sun are responsible for a lot of cancers, but they can also happen because the body's own genetic machinery makes occasional mistakes.

I think you're talking about the bubonic plague.

And no viruses don't just "disappear over time". That's a misconception.

cheerfulgreek 09-24-2011 06:57 PM

"Abduction" was awful. 0 stars out of 5. Maybe because "teen wolf" was the lead actor.:rolleyes:

DrPhil 09-24-2011 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek (Post 2094627)
"Abduction" was awful. 0 stars out of 5. Maybe because "teen wolf" was the lead actor.:rolleyes:

Critics are absolutely slamming this movie. I am not surprised considering how Lautner is characterized as having martial arts skills and tight abs but NO acting skills. I also think there's a Twilight bias in the critics' reviews.

I haven't seen Abduction but I disagree with one critic's critism of John Singleton. He called Boyz in the Hood overpraised and said Singleton hasn't really done anything good since then (including Abduction). I disagree.

Cen1aur 1963 09-27-2011 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek (Post 2093160)
Nope, they're not the same. Viruses mutate much faster than bacteria. Higher organisms, including protozoa such as malaria, change slowest of all. It's just that it all depends on the relative genetic complexity. Random mutations are less likely to totally cripple a simpler organism, so the fewer the number of genes, the more rapidly an organism can change, yet remain functional. Higher organisms have about 10,000-50,000 genes, bacteria have about 500-5000 genes, and viruses have 3-1000 genes. To make it easier for you to understand how they work, consider two machines, one with just a few components and the other with a lot. The more parts that interact with each other, the less flexibility we have to alter any individual component. If we randomly change one part of a simpler machine, it's less likely to cause problems. It's just that the fewer genes, the more likely mutations will be tolerated and the faster evolution may occur.

Cancer is also different. Cancers happen because of a build-up of genetic damage over the years in non reproductive cells. It's just that cancer cells grow out of control and destroy the body to which they belong. Toxic chemicals, both natural and artificial, and ultraviolet radiation from the sun are responsible for a lot of cancers, but they can also happen because the body's own genetic machinery makes occasional mistakes.

I think you're talking about the bubonic plague.

And no viruses don't just "disappear over time". That's a misconception.

This is a lot LOL. I learned something here. I didn't know there was a difference.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 2094721)
Critics are absolutely slamming this movie. I am not surprised considering how Lautner is characterized as having martial arts skills and tight abs but NO acting skills. I also think there's a Twilight bias in the critics' reviews.

I haven't seen Abduction but I disagree with one critic's critism of John Singleton. He called Boyz in the Hood overpraised and said Singleton hasn't really done anything good since then (including Abduction). I disagree.

I was about to see this movie, too. Based on what's been said, I might wait for it to hit DVD.

cheerfulgreek 09-27-2011 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cen1aur 1963 (Post 2095727)
I was about to see this movie, too. Based on what's been said, I might wait for it to hit DVD.

It's not even worth the $3.00 bucks to rent it on DVD. I mean, unless you like Mr. Teen Wolf and anything Twilight.

cheerfulgreek 09-28-2011 09:25 PM

I wonder what "The Debt" is about...maybe a late show is showing.

cheerfulgreek 10-03-2011 08:55 PM

I forgot to post this this morning. "Dream House" wasn't scary but it was really good. 4 stars out of 5. Why did I cry at the end? :o

PrettyBoy 10-13-2011 12:30 AM

Real Steel -Lame. Rocky in robot form basically.

KKGCaroline 10-25-2011 07:24 AM

Paranormal Activity 3...... was amazing

DrPhil 10-25-2011 09:45 AM

I hate Paranormal Activity and have not seen it since the first one. I am intrigued by the over $50 million in the box office during opening weekend.

I will play it safe and Redbox it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.